Review



x gal  (Thermo Fisher)


Bioz Verified Symbol Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Thermo Fisher manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Thermo Fisher x gal
    X Gal, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 116 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/x gal/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 94 stars, based on 116 article reviews
    x gal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Gold Biotechnology Inc x gal
    Tagging a nanobody to the N-terminus <t>of</t> <t>β-gal</t> does not affect its activity. (A) Colonies of dH5α bacteria transformed with a plasmid containing the coding sequence for β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a 4AA (GSHV) linker and plated on an LB/Kan plate with IPTG and <t>X-gal.</t> The plate was photographed 24 h after incubation at 37 °C for 16 h. (B), (C), and (D) are the same as (A), except that the bacteria were induced to express β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a longer flexible peptide (GSGASGSHV), a Strep-tag-containing peptide (GSWSHPQFEKHV), or β-gal with purification tags, respectively.
    X Gal, supplied by Gold Biotechnology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/x gal/product/Gold Biotechnology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    x gal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Biotium japan cat
    Tagging a nanobody to the N-terminus <t>of</t> <t>β-gal</t> does not affect its activity. (A) Colonies of dH5α bacteria transformed with a plasmid containing the coding sequence for β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a 4AA (GSHV) linker and plated on an LB/Kan plate with IPTG and <t>X-gal.</t> The plate was photographed 24 h after incubation at 37 °C for 16 h. (B), (C), and (D) are the same as (A), except that the bacteria were induced to express β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a longer flexible peptide (GSGASGSHV), a Strep-tag-containing peptide (GSWSHPQFEKHV), or β-gal with purification tags, respectively.
    Japan Cat, supplied by Biotium, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/japan cat/product/Biotium
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    japan cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Thermo Fisher x gal
    Tagging a nanobody to the N-terminus <t>of</t> <t>β-gal</t> does not affect its activity. (A) Colonies of dH5α bacteria transformed with a plasmid containing the coding sequence for β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a 4AA (GSHV) linker and plated on an LB/Kan plate with IPTG and <t>X-gal.</t> The plate was photographed 24 h after incubation at 37 °C for 16 h. (B), (C), and (D) are the same as (A), except that the bacteria were induced to express β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a longer flexible peptide (GSGASGSHV), a Strep-tag-containing peptide (GSWSHPQFEKHV), or β-gal with purification tags, respectively.
    X Gal, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/x gal/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    x gal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Thermo Fisher x gal luria bertani lb agar
    ( a ) The LsrR protein was expressed and purified. M: BlueStar Prestained Protein Marker (180 kDa); Line 1: purified LsrR protein flow-through with a size of 60 kDa; Line 2: LsrR positive control; and Line 3: PBS negative control. ( b ) Graphic representation and confirmation of the mutant and complementary strains by PCR. PCR lanes 1–3 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN internal primer-F/R, and lanes 4–6 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN external primer-F/R. The primers used for the PCR identification of the cysN gene deletion are also indicated. The amplification of the corresponding target genes indicates success in constructing mutant and complemented strains. ( c ) Bluish colonies <t>on</t> <t>X-gal</t> plates indicated interaction between LsrR and cysN (pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-cysN). In contrast, pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-ompA was used as a negative control (no interaction/whitish colonies) and pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-zip as a positive control (interaction/ bluish colonies). ( d ) LsrR binds to the cysN promoters. The binding ability of LsrR to the cysN promoters was determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. An increasing amount of LsrR was incubated with excess Cy5.5-labeled probes. Lane 1: free probe. In each panel, from lanes 2 to 7, the concentration of LsrR was 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 2 μM, respectively; the amount of Cy5.5-labeled probes was all 50 fmol (the concentrations were all 5 nM). In lanes 8–9, 200 fmol of unlabeled probes were incubated with the LsrR protein beside the labeled probes. In lane 9, protein FabH was run as a negative control. ( e ) LsrR activates cysN transcription. Relative expression of the cysN gene in the APEC94 strain compared to the APEC94∆lsrR mutant, as determined by qRT-PCR. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene dnaE , and the relative expression level in the APEC94 was set to 1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test (*** P < 0.001). ( f ) DNase I footprinting identified an LsrR-binding site within the cysN promoter. Sequence alignment of this protected region revealed the LsrR conserved binding sequence.
    X Gal Luria Bertani Lb Agar, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/x gal luria bertani lb agar/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    x gal luria bertani lb agar - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    TaKaRa x α gal
    ( a ) The LsrR protein was expressed and purified. M: BlueStar Prestained Protein Marker (180 kDa); Line 1: purified LsrR protein flow-through with a size of 60 kDa; Line 2: LsrR positive control; and Line 3: PBS negative control. ( b ) Graphic representation and confirmation of the mutant and complementary strains by PCR. PCR lanes 1–3 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN internal primer-F/R, and lanes 4–6 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN external primer-F/R. The primers used for the PCR identification of the cysN gene deletion are also indicated. The amplification of the corresponding target genes indicates success in constructing mutant and complemented strains. ( c ) Bluish colonies <t>on</t> <t>X-gal</t> plates indicated interaction between LsrR and cysN (pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-cysN). In contrast, pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-ompA was used as a negative control (no interaction/whitish colonies) and pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-zip as a positive control (interaction/ bluish colonies). ( d ) LsrR binds to the cysN promoters. The binding ability of LsrR to the cysN promoters was determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. An increasing amount of LsrR was incubated with excess Cy5.5-labeled probes. Lane 1: free probe. In each panel, from lanes 2 to 7, the concentration of LsrR was 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 2 μM, respectively; the amount of Cy5.5-labeled probes was all 50 fmol (the concentrations were all 5 nM). In lanes 8–9, 200 fmol of unlabeled probes were incubated with the LsrR protein beside the labeled probes. In lane 9, protein FabH was run as a negative control. ( e ) LsrR activates cysN transcription. Relative expression of the cysN gene in the APEC94 strain compared to the APEC94∆lsrR mutant, as determined by qRT-PCR. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene dnaE , and the relative expression level in the APEC94 was set to 1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test (*** P < 0.001). ( f ) DNase I footprinting identified an LsrR-binding site within the cysN promoter. Sequence alignment of this protected region revealed the LsrR conserved binding sequence.
    X α Gal, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/x α gal/product/TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    x α gal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    TaKaRa x gal
    ( a ) The LsrR protein was expressed and purified. M: BlueStar Prestained Protein Marker (180 kDa); Line 1: purified LsrR protein flow-through with a size of 60 kDa; Line 2: LsrR positive control; and Line 3: PBS negative control. ( b ) Graphic representation and confirmation of the mutant and complementary strains by PCR. PCR lanes 1–3 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN internal primer-F/R, and lanes 4–6 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN external primer-F/R. The primers used for the PCR identification of the cysN gene deletion are also indicated. The amplification of the corresponding target genes indicates success in constructing mutant and complemented strains. ( c ) Bluish colonies <t>on</t> <t>X-gal</t> plates indicated interaction between LsrR and cysN (pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-cysN). In contrast, pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-ompA was used as a negative control (no interaction/whitish colonies) and pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-zip as a positive control (interaction/ bluish colonies). ( d ) LsrR binds to the cysN promoters. The binding ability of LsrR to the cysN promoters was determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. An increasing amount of LsrR was incubated with excess Cy5.5-labeled probes. Lane 1: free probe. In each panel, from lanes 2 to 7, the concentration of LsrR was 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 2 μM, respectively; the amount of Cy5.5-labeled probes was all 50 fmol (the concentrations were all 5 nM). In lanes 8–9, 200 fmol of unlabeled probes were incubated with the LsrR protein beside the labeled probes. In lane 9, protein FabH was run as a negative control. ( e ) LsrR activates cysN transcription. Relative expression of the cysN gene in the APEC94 strain compared to the APEC94∆lsrR mutant, as determined by qRT-PCR. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene dnaE , and the relative expression level in the APEC94 was set to 1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test (*** P < 0.001). ( f ) DNase I footprinting identified an LsrR-binding site within the cysN promoter. Sequence alignment of this protected region revealed the LsrR conserved binding sequence.
    X Gal, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/x gal/product/TaKaRa
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    x gal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Vector Laboratories x gal
    ( a ) The LsrR protein was expressed and purified. M: BlueStar Prestained Protein Marker (180 kDa); Line 1: purified LsrR protein flow-through with a size of 60 kDa; Line 2: LsrR positive control; and Line 3: PBS negative control. ( b ) Graphic representation and confirmation of the mutant and complementary strains by PCR. PCR lanes 1–3 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN internal primer-F/R, and lanes 4–6 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN external primer-F/R. The primers used for the PCR identification of the cysN gene deletion are also indicated. The amplification of the corresponding target genes indicates success in constructing mutant and complemented strains. ( c ) Bluish colonies <t>on</t> <t>X-gal</t> plates indicated interaction between LsrR and cysN (pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-cysN). In contrast, pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-ompA was used as a negative control (no interaction/whitish colonies) and pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-zip as a positive control (interaction/ bluish colonies). ( d ) LsrR binds to the cysN promoters. The binding ability of LsrR to the cysN promoters was determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. An increasing amount of LsrR was incubated with excess Cy5.5-labeled probes. Lane 1: free probe. In each panel, from lanes 2 to 7, the concentration of LsrR was 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 2 μM, respectively; the amount of Cy5.5-labeled probes was all 50 fmol (the concentrations were all 5 nM). In lanes 8–9, 200 fmol of unlabeled probes were incubated with the LsrR protein beside the labeled probes. In lane 9, protein FabH was run as a negative control. ( e ) LsrR activates cysN transcription. Relative expression of the cysN gene in the APEC94 strain compared to the APEC94∆lsrR mutant, as determined by qRT-PCR. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene dnaE , and the relative expression level in the APEC94 was set to 1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test (*** P < 0.001). ( f ) DNase I footprinting identified an LsrR-binding site within the cysN promoter. Sequence alignment of this protected region revealed the LsrR conserved binding sequence.
    X Gal, supplied by Vector Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/x gal/product/Vector Laboratories
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    x gal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Tagging a nanobody to the N-terminus of β-gal does not affect its activity. (A) Colonies of dH5α bacteria transformed with a plasmid containing the coding sequence for β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a 4AA (GSHV) linker and plated on an LB/Kan plate with IPTG and X-gal. The plate was photographed 24 h after incubation at 37 °C for 16 h. (B), (C), and (D) are the same as (A), except that the bacteria were induced to express β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a longer flexible peptide (GSGASGSHV), a Strep-tag-containing peptide (GSWSHPQFEKHV), or β-gal with purification tags, respectively.

    Journal: Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences

    Article Title: Usage of nanobody-beta-galactosidase fusion in immunoassays and its application in detecting a peanut allergen

    doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2026.100357

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tagging a nanobody to the N-terminus of β-gal does not affect its activity. (A) Colonies of dH5α bacteria transformed with a plasmid containing the coding sequence for β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a 4AA (GSHV) linker and plated on an LB/Kan plate with IPTG and X-gal. The plate was photographed 24 h after incubation at 37 °C for 16 h. (B), (C), and (D) are the same as (A), except that the bacteria were induced to express β-gal with Nb16 fused to its N-terminus via a longer flexible peptide (GSGASGSHV), a Strep-tag-containing peptide (GSWSHPQFEKHV), or β-gal with purification tags, respectively.

    Article Snippet: Milli-Q water was purified in-house using a Milli-Q Advantage A10 system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and used throughout. o -Nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (ONPG), Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), Kanamycin (Kan), and X-Gal were purchased from GoldBio (St Louis, MO, USA).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Bacteria, Transformation Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Sequencing, Incubation, Strep-tag, Purification

    ( a ) The LsrR protein was expressed and purified. M: BlueStar Prestained Protein Marker (180 kDa); Line 1: purified LsrR protein flow-through with a size of 60 kDa; Line 2: LsrR positive control; and Line 3: PBS negative control. ( b ) Graphic representation and confirmation of the mutant and complementary strains by PCR. PCR lanes 1–3 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN internal primer-F/R, and lanes 4–6 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN external primer-F/R. The primers used for the PCR identification of the cysN gene deletion are also indicated. The amplification of the corresponding target genes indicates success in constructing mutant and complemented strains. ( c ) Bluish colonies on X-gal plates indicated interaction between LsrR and cysN (pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-cysN). In contrast, pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-ompA was used as a negative control (no interaction/whitish colonies) and pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-zip as a positive control (interaction/ bluish colonies). ( d ) LsrR binds to the cysN promoters. The binding ability of LsrR to the cysN promoters was determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. An increasing amount of LsrR was incubated with excess Cy5.5-labeled probes. Lane 1: free probe. In each panel, from lanes 2 to 7, the concentration of LsrR was 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 2 μM, respectively; the amount of Cy5.5-labeled probes was all 50 fmol (the concentrations were all 5 nM). In lanes 8–9, 200 fmol of unlabeled probes were incubated with the LsrR protein beside the labeled probes. In lane 9, protein FabH was run as a negative control. ( e ) LsrR activates cysN transcription. Relative expression of the cysN gene in the APEC94 strain compared to the APEC94∆lsrR mutant, as determined by qRT-PCR. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene dnaE , and the relative expression level in the APEC94 was set to 1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test (*** P < 0.001). ( f ) DNase I footprinting identified an LsrR-binding site within the cysN promoter. Sequence alignment of this protected region revealed the LsrR conserved binding sequence.

    Journal: Infection and Immunity

    Article Title: Quorum-sensing regulator LsrR modulates avian pathogenic Escherichia coli pathogenicity through direct regulation of cysN

    doi: 10.1128/iai.00421-25

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) The LsrR protein was expressed and purified. M: BlueStar Prestained Protein Marker (180 kDa); Line 1: purified LsrR protein flow-through with a size of 60 kDa; Line 2: LsrR positive control; and Line 3: PBS negative control. ( b ) Graphic representation and confirmation of the mutant and complementary strains by PCR. PCR lanes 1–3 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN internal primer-F/R, and lanes 4–6 confirmed cysN deletion with the cysN external primer-F/R. The primers used for the PCR identification of the cysN gene deletion are also indicated. The amplification of the corresponding target genes indicates success in constructing mutant and complemented strains. ( c ) Bluish colonies on X-gal plates indicated interaction between LsrR and cysN (pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-cysN). In contrast, pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-ompA was used as a negative control (no interaction/whitish colonies) and pUT18C-lsrR-BHT101-pKT25-zip as a positive control (interaction/ bluish colonies). ( d ) LsrR binds to the cysN promoters. The binding ability of LsrR to the cysN promoters was determined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. An increasing amount of LsrR was incubated with excess Cy5.5-labeled probes. Lane 1: free probe. In each panel, from lanes 2 to 7, the concentration of LsrR was 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 2 μM, respectively; the amount of Cy5.5-labeled probes was all 50 fmol (the concentrations were all 5 nM). In lanes 8–9, 200 fmol of unlabeled probes were incubated with the LsrR protein beside the labeled probes. In lane 9, protein FabH was run as a negative control. ( e ) LsrR activates cysN transcription. Relative expression of the cysN gene in the APEC94 strain compared to the APEC94∆lsrR mutant, as determined by qRT-PCR. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene dnaE , and the relative expression level in the APEC94 was set to 1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from three independent biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test (*** P < 0.001). ( f ) DNase I footprinting identified an LsrR-binding site within the cysN promoter. Sequence alignment of this protected region revealed the LsrR conserved binding sequence.

    Article Snippet: Following overnight culturing, centrifugation, reconstitution, and PCR detection to confirm the sequence, X-GAL Luria-Bertani (LB) agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates were prepared by adding X-GAL (20 mg/mL).

    Techniques: Purification, Marker, Positive Control, Negative Control, Mutagenesis, Amplification, Binding Assay, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Incubation, Labeling, Concentration Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Footprinting, Sequencing